内容摘要：Recorder Mullarkey said only an immediate prison sentence was appropriate.

Recorder Mullarkey said only an immediate prison sentence was appropriate.

Kerry said she supported a child-led approach."When your child starts to be inquisitive and ask questions then you know it's the right time to answer those questions," she said.

"If you don't, they will seek that information from somewhere else or they will pick up the answers from friends at school or online."But what sort of detail is appropriate to give?Kerry said when she was pregnant with her second child her eight-year-old asked her how the baby had got into her tummy while they were at a bus stop.

"She was ready to know the answer, but it just wasn't the right time to give it," explained Kerry.She said she later gave her an honest answer "but without being too descriptive".

"I think I remember telling her about different parts of the body, that boys have testicles and they have sperm in them and the daddy's sperm goes and meets with the mummy's egg and that's how a baby grows.

"That was enough information for her at that age. So it was an honest answer, but I didn't go into 'we have sex' because she didn't need that then."A public inquiry held in the aftermath found there were "no villains" and only human beings who made mistakes.

However, making its application, Phoenix Law said there had been an "irregularity of proceedings in the original inquest" which had not commented on or addressed "substantial issues" including the cause of the fire.The firm said there was "substantial fresh evidence which was not heard at the original inquest or commission which call into question the central conclusions", suggesting the forensic analysis of the time was now "unreliable".

A spokesman also said several experts had provided written support for a fresh investigation into the fire "on the premise that there have been significant developments within the forensic science on how fires are investigated".He said they had pointed to the